Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA09928; Fri, 22 Mar 1996 15:51:07 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Fri, 22 Mar 1996 15:50:33 -0500 Received: from jekyll.piermont.com (jekyll.piermont.com [206.1.51.15]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA09773; Fri, 22 Mar 1996 15:50:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (perry@localhost) by jekyll.piermont.com (8.7.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA23934; Fri, 22 Mar 1996 15:50:14 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199603222050.PAA23934@jekyll.piermont.com> X-Authentication-Warning: jekyll.piermont.com: Host perry@localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein) cc: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Issues summary web page In-reply-to: Your message of "22 Mar 1996 20:43:14 GMT." <19960322204314.7760.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> Reply-To: perry@piermont.com X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 15:50:14 -0500 From: "Perry E. Metzger" D. J. Bernstein writes: > > Usenet has long had the capability of threaded newsreaders. People > > have long wanted this feature in e-mail. > > That's true. It would be fine for 822bis to point out how wonderful > Message-IDs are for this purpose. But this does not justify _universal_ > Message-IDs. There are many messages---notably DSNs---that are not > useful targets of a References line. Why aren't they? Lets say someone starts a mail exchange with the postmaster and wants to refer back to the original message? Adding message-ID's is so trivial that I don't understand what the reason not to create them could be other than lazyness on the part of an implementor. Perry