Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA25660; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 15:01:06 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 15:01:05 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA25651; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 15:01:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (NX5.67e/UW-NDC Revision: 2.27.MRC ) id AA17918; Tue, 6 Jun 95 12:00:56 -0700 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 11:53:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Crispin Sender: Mark Crispin Subject: re: 822 problem list To: John Gardiner Myers Cc: drums@CS.UTK.EDU In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII On Tue, 6 Jun 1995 12:48:45 -0400 (EDT), John Gardiner Myers wrote: > 6.2.2 continues to be problematic. The wording in RFC1123 5.2.18 > should completely replace 6.2.2. This was a sop to old religion. I think it can be flushed. > 6.2.5 appears to be obsolete. At least I don't understand it. This had to do with CSnet mailboxes and the small matter that my email address at the time was "ADMIN.MRC@SU-SCORE.ARPA". Dave Crocker and I argued about this for a long time; he claimed that the "ADMIN." was a subdomain name when in fact it was just a part of my user name (MRC was a subdirectory of the root level ADMIN directory). But, having special semantics in RFC 822 for CSnet format addresses such as smith.utexas@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA was important to Dave, and we couldn't achieve cloture on my proposal to just say that "." was an ordinary character. Rather than revive this old war (hi Dave!), I suggest we just decree that it's been "overtaken by events" and can be flushed. This would tend to push towards removing "." from the list of specials. -- Mark --