Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA11238; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:17:16 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:16:35 -0500 Received: from CU.NIH.GOV (cu.nih.gov [128.231.64.111]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA11204; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:16:30 -0500 Message-Id: <199603260116.UAA11204@CS.UTK.EDU> To: drums@cs.utk.edu From: "Roger Fajman" Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:14:00 EST Subject: Re: timezones & Date > Problem is, this means that readers don't know whether +0000 is an > honest GMT or an expression of ignorance. We should either require the > correct zone or provide an explicit means to declare that, even though > the actual time is correct, the zone is unknown. It's somewhat of a kludge, but +0001 could be used to indicate ignorance of the actual time zone. I don't think it's likely to conflict with any real time zone. :-)