Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA02222; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:29:14 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:29:13 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from po7.andrew.cmu.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA02215; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:29:09 -0400 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po7.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA16869 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:28:31 -0400 Received: via switchmail; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:27:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:27:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 15:27:32 -0400 (EDT) From: John Gardiner Myers To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Fwd: 822 AS wording References: Beak: Is An old mailext message that is relevant to this group: The problem this is addressing is that there are multiple incompatible interpretations being made of the same field-name. ---------- Forwarded message begins here ---------- X-Andrew-Authenticated-As: 2971;andrew.cmu.edu;John Gardiner Myers Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Wed, 8 Feb 1995 21:37:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 21:37:50 -0500 (EST) From: John Gardiner Myers To: mailext@cs.wisc.edu Subject: 822 AS wording Beak: Is I would like to propose the following section be included in the upcoming 822 AS document: X. Reservation of RFC 1036 field-names Unless otherwise defined in a standards-track document, field-names defined in RFC 1036 are reserved and MUST NOT not be used for purposes other than described in RFC 1036. For example, the field-name "Newsgroups" is defined in RFC 1036 as specifying the newsgroup or newsgroups in which the message belongs. Since this field-name is not otherwised defined in a standards-track document, user agents which use this header to list the newsgroups in which the previous correspondence which the message answers belonged are nonconforming. -- _.John G. Myers Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU LoseNet: ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up