Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA22387; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:47:42 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:45:57 -0500
Received: from po10.andrew.cmu.edu (PO10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.110]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA22183; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:45:50 -0500
Received: (from postman@localhost) by po10.andrew.cmu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.1) id MAA00612 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:45:40 -0500
Received: via switchmail; Wed,  3 Apr 1996 12:45:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nifty.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail
          ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/testq0/QF.8lMfYFe00WA7IDwU5Y>;
          Wed,  3 Apr 1996 12:44:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: via niftymail; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:44:49 -0500 (EST)
Sender: Chris Newman <chrisn+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:44:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Chris Newman <chrisn+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: generating RFC 822 addresses
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
In-Reply-To: <9604031446.AA01298@mercutio.admin.kth.se>
References: <828416297.20873.0@nifty.andrew.cmu.edu>
	<19960402044725.9750.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
	<v03005b02ad86748752e2@[205.214.160.49]>
	<9604031446.AA01298@mercutio.admin.kth.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <828553489.10043.0@nifty.andrew.cmu.edu>

 Olle Jarnefors <ojarnef@admin.kth.se> writes:
> I have found one use for providing real world name information
> in _both_ the phrase part and a comment, as examplified by my
> own
>
> From: Olle Jarnefors <ojarnef@admin.kth.se>
>       (=?iso-8859-1?q?Olle_J=E4rnefors?=)

This is certainly a reasonable thing to do with comments, and I see no
reason to outlaw it.  It should be simple to state a requirement for
the "phrase <route-addr>" format (when the human name is known) over
the "addr-spec" format without outlawing comments after the address.
(continue)
-----
Chris Newman <chrisn+@cmu.edu>, http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~nifty/
U.S. Citizens: Ask your representatives to support S.1567 for Internet free
speech, and S.1587/HR.3011 for a right to Internet privacy and encryption.