Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id DAA11879; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 03:22:27 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 03:22:26 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from vall.dsv.su.se by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id DAA11864; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 03:22:21 -0400 Received: from ester.dsv.su.se (ester.dsv.su.se [130.237.161.10]) by vall.dsv.su.se (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA16967; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 09:22:14 +0200 Received: by ester.dsv.su.se (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16464; Fri, 28 Jul 95 09:22:13 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 09:22:12 +0200 (MET DST) From: Jacob Palme X-Sender: jpalme@ester To: Eric Thomas Cc: ietf-drums Subject: Re: Message-ID mandatory In-Reply-To: <199507271445.QAA29622@mars.dsv.su.se> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 27 Jul 1995, Eric Thomas wrote: > Well, currently the syntax requires an addr-spec, ie xxx@hostname. It > isn't say explicitly but the intent is clearly that the gateway uses its > own hostname, to guarantee uniqueness. Anyway, unless you use a dummy > hostname this will not be the same. One could either use the hostname of the first name in the "From:" field, or a dummy host name like "check.sum1.net" or something like that. The "1" is to allow possible future versions using other checksum computing algorithms. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jacob Palme (Stockholm University and KTH) for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme