Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA00884; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 22:43:55 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.6); Sun, 30 Jun 1996 22:43:20 -0400 Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (qmailr@KOOBERA.MATH.UIC.EDU [128.248.178.247]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA00851; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 22:43:17 -0400 Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 666); 1 Jul 1996 02:46:47 -0000 Date: 1 Jul 1996 02:46:47 -0000 Message-ID: <19960701024647.130.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> From: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein) To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: 821bis outstanding issues list -- post Montreal > First of all, my understanding (albeit from a comment made by Erik Fair at > the DRUMS session) is that as written, 1123 requires not that you just get > *an* A record, but that you get the *canonical* A record. ``The domain names ... MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., they must be fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not nicknames or domain abbreviations. A canonicalized name either identifies a host directly or is an MX name; it cannot be a CNAME.'' (821: ``Whenever domain names are used in SMTP only the official names are used, the use of nicknames or aliases is not allowed.'') Neither ``official name'' nor ``principal name'' is defined, but there's nothing to suggest that they should mean ``PTR target.'' Doing an A lookup followed by a PTR lookup wouldn't make much sense: it could give you a domain with an entirely different set of MX records. Look at phoenix-subnet128.princeton.edu, for example. > Maybe this is where I misunderstood: I was under the impression that SMTP > servers simply pass along the "RCPT TO:" envelope unmolested if it is just > relaying. Is this not the case? It is not the case, at least for sendmail and qmail. ---Dan