Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA14323; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:12:44 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:12:40 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from info.cren.net by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA14313; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:12:37 -0400
Received: from [192.52.179.12] (conklin-180c.cren.net [192.52.179.12]) by info.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.4 (CREN)) with SMTP id SAA27998; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:12:09 -0400
Message-Id: <199508162212.SAA27998@info.cren.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:15:13 +0100
To: Chris Newman <chrisn+@CMU.EDU>, ietf-drums <drums@CS.UTK.EDU>
From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)
Subject: Re: "Reply-To"

At  1:51 PM 8/16/95 -0400, Chris Newman wrote:
> I'd like to
>point out that a solution to both problems has already been written up
>in the internet draft:
>
>        draft-myers-822-widereply-00.txt

  I've just read that draft, and I'm afraid that I don't really see what
Wide-Reply-To, as I understand it from the draft, accomplishes that isn't
equally well accomplished by plain-old-Reply-To with multiple addresses,
except perhaps in the Andrew-specific context.
  I don't think it's the answer to the problem, as the draft presently stands.

Jim