Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA15943; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:34:48 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:34:47 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from wilma.cs.utk.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA15937; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:34:45 -0400
Received: from LOCALHOST by wilma.cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.11c-UTK)
          id SAA25293; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:34:42 -0400
Message-Id: <199508162234.SAA25293@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: perry@piermont.com
cc: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>, Chris Newman <chrisn+@cmu.edu>,
        drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: "Reply-To" 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:11:56 EDT."
             <199508162211.SAA00205@frankenstein.piermont.com> 
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 18:34:36 -0400
Sender: moore@CS.UTK.EDU

> Well, we don't need Authorized-by, since we already have "Sender",
> right?

It's not quite the same thing.  If I authorize my secretary to send
a note, *my* name goes in Authorized-by, but my secretary's name
goes in Sender.  (in 822, my name would go in the From field).

K