Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA01322; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:40:41 -0400
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.6); Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:40:16 -0400
Received: from emout12.mail.aol.com (emout12.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.38]) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA01242; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:40:11 -0400
From: <Jay@aol.com>
Received: by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA17116; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:39:37 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:39:37 -0400
Message-ID: <960930123937_320846789@emout12.mail.aol.com>
To: perry@piermont.com, drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: what to do if you are rejecting mail...

In a message dated 96-09-30 12:18:06 EDT, perry@piermont.com (Perry E.
Metzger) writes:

> I'd decided that I'd had it with cyberpromo.com bombing me with spam
>  all the time, and so I'm hacking my personal and highly customized
>  smtpd to reject mail from their sites. The problem is, I want to
>  follow the standards cleanly, and I can't see that anyone had
>  previously considered the possibility that one might be systematically
>  rejecting all mail from a given site. Any ideas on what the correct
>  response should be, and should it be in our documents?
 
We're using "571 Delivery refused".

Jay Levitt
AOL