Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA23864; Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:02:48 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:02:46 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from daisy.ee.und.ac.za by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA23824; Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:02:41 -0400 Received: by daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Smail3.1.28.1 #31) id m0sjC55-0007V2C; Thu, 17 Aug 95 23:02 GMT+0200 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 23:02:27 +0200 (GMT+0200) From: Alan Barrett To: ietf-drums Subject: Re: "Reply-To" In-Reply-To: <199508162042.QAA27222@info.cren.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 16 Aug 1995, Jim Conklin wrote: > Please understand that mailing-list managers (as distinguished from > list expanders) have for years been acting as surrogate senders for > message originators who send their mail to these lists perfectly happy > that the mailing-list manager acts as Sender for their message to the > list and, as Sender, creates a Reply-To header as the participants of > the list have either agreed to or accepted as appropriate for that > list. Such mailing list managers should change the Message-ID to show that the message they are sending (with munged headers) is not the same as the message that they received. --apb (Alan Barrett)