Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA16760; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:06:24 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:06:22 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from info.cren.net by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA16720; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:06:12 -0400 Received: from [192.52.179.12] (conklin-180c.cren.net [192.52.179.12]) by info.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.4 (CREN)) with SMTP id PAA27995; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:06:05 -0400 Message-Id: <199508241906.PAA27995@info.cren.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 15:08:56 +0100 To: michael.derrico@software.com (Michael D'Errico), Keith Moore From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin) Subject: Re: Getting back on track (a.k.a. Reply-To:) Cc: Eric Thomas , drums@CS.UTK.EDU At 9:15 AM 8/24/95 -0700, Michael D'Errico wrote: > ... It seems to >me that the problem with Reply-To and mailing lists is that MUAs don't have a >good concept of what a mailing list is. If they provided: > > Reply to Sender > *Reply to List* > Reply to All > >then the ambiguity of who the sender is (is it the list or the author?) goes >away. ... if there was >a way to flag a message as being from a list, perhaps with a new header ... Right on, Mike! Jim