Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA23358; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 21:53:59 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Sun, 24 Nov 1996 21:52:43 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA23212; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 21:52:41 -0500 Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (qmailr@koobera.math.uic.edu [128.248.178.247]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA23204; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 21:52:38 -0500 Received: (qmail 16027 invoked by uid 666); 25 Nov 1996 02:58:09 -0000 Date: 25 Nov 1996 02:58:09 -0000 Message-ID: <19961125025809.16026.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> From: "D. J. Bernstein" To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: 2LD NS SMTP survey > the time frame involved, I didn't time it. Downloading the zone files was the hard part. > the problems encountered, Well, the MTA isn't always obvious from the greeting line and HELP response. Here are my current guesses: /Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Connector/ { ++exchange; next } /NT Server running Internet Shopper/ { ++ntmail; next } /Simple Mail Transfer Service Ready/ { ++smtsrfoo; next } /send comments to qmail@pobox.com/ { ++qmail; next } /CommuniGate SMTPGate is ready/ { ++communigate; next } /Apple Internet Mail Server/ { ++aims; next } /post.office E-mail system/ { ++postoffice; next } /TGV.MultiNet SMTP server/ { ++tgv; next } /MailSite SMTP Receiver/ { ++mailsite; next } /Worldgroup SMTP server/ { ++worldgroup; next } /Generic SMTP handler/ { ++raptor; next } /Netscape Mail Server/ { ++netscape; next } /EMWAC SMTP Receiver/ { ++emwac; next } /GroupWise SMTP.MIME/ { ++groupwise; next } /MetaInfo Sendmail/ { ++metainfo; next } /IMS SMTP Receiver/ { ++ims; next } /running MailShare/ { ++mailshare; next } /ListSTAR Package/ { ++liststar; next } /TGV MultiNet V/ { ++tgv; next } /AltaVista Mail/ { ++avmail; next } /Lotus SMTP MTA/ { ++lotus; next } /MX V.\..-. VAX/ { ++vmsmx; next } /post.office v/ { ++postoffice; next } /Connect2-SMTP/ { ++connect2; next } /MX V.\.. VAX/ { ++vmsmx; next } /MX V.\.. AXP/ { ++vmsmx; next } /Zachariassen/ { ++zmailer; next } /Pony Express/ { ++pony; next} /SMTP.OpenVMS/ { ++openvms; next } /IBM VM SMTP/ { ++ibmvm; next } /NASTA Gate/ { ++nasta; next } /SMTP.smap/ { ++smap; next } /Smail3.1/ { ++smail31; next } /SLmail95/ { ++slmail; next } /SLmailNT/ { ++slmail; next } /SLMAILNT/ { ++slmail; next } /Sendmail/ { ++sendmail; next } /PMDF V/ { ++pmdf; next } /SMTPXD/ { ++smtpxd; next } /IMail/ { ++imail; next } /Exim/ { ++exim; next } /UCX / { ++ucx; next } /The normal sequence of events in sending a message/ { ++normalfoo; next } /[pP][pP].*Pleased to meet you/ { ++pp; next } /Help \.\.\. Not recognized/ { ++helpfoo; next } /For more info use .HELP/ { ++sendmail; next } /unimplemented..#5.5.1/ { ++qmail; next } /Complaints.bugs to/ { ++mmdf; next } I don't know what the smtsrfoo, helpfoo, and normalfoo MTAs are, and a solid 2% of the responses don't match any of the above categories. ---Dan Sick of sendmail? Don't get mad; get qmail. http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html