Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA29793; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 18:52:04 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 18:52:01 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA29770; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 18:51:53 -0400
Received: from localhost by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU
	(NX5.67e/UW-NDC Revision: 2.27.MRC ) id AA16100; Fri, 25 Aug 95 15:51:47 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 15:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Sender: Mark Crispin <mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Subject: Re: From the Chair: the Reply-To issue 
To: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>,
        drums@CS.UTK.EDU
In-Reply-To: <199508252237.SAA13527@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
Message-Id: <MailManager.809390827.15625.mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

On Fri, 25 Aug 1995 18:36:54 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> So on this particular issue, I want people to very clearly state
> whether Reply-to expresses the author's preference about (pick one):
>
> [ ] where replies to the message should be sent
>
> [ ] where replies to the *author* should be sent

Both of the above, interpretation determined by the recipient in his selection
of "reply" or "reply all".