Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id CAA26133; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 02:41:20 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 02:41:18 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from domen.uninett.no by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id CAA26122; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 02:41:12 -0400 Received: from dale.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <20552-0@domen.uninett.no>; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 08:41:01 +0200 Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA08842 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 08:40:55 +0200 Message-Id: <199509050640.IAA08842@dale.uninett.no> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94 From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Another header-munging example..... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 08:40:52 +0200 Sender: hta@dale.uninett.no Now, here's a new one: A list munger that uses From: and To: as the intended destination for wide-reply-to, and Reply-To: as the intended destination for narrow-reply-to... Date: 04 Sep 95 02:18:32 From: "unicode@unicode.org" To: unicode@unicode.org Subject: Identifying languages Reply-to: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no X-Orcl-Application: Errors-To: uni-bounce@unicode.org Message-ID: <"aun.uninet.660:04.09.95.20.01.12"@uninett.no> I think the Area Directors are likely to heartily applaud (and rent out asbestos suits to) someone offering a draft of an "advice to header mungers" document - OUTSIDE DRUMS. Harald A