Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA24403; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:41:54 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:41:30 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA24348; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:41:28 -0500 Received: from rodan.UU.NET (84@rodan.UU.NET [153.39.130.10]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA24342; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:41:25 -0500 Received: by rodan.UU.NET id QQbwvm08858; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:41:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:41:23 -0500 (EST) From: mo@UU.NET (Mike O'Dell) Message-Id: To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: my 2 cents on this lofty topic Cc: mo@UU.NET for some reason, this was sent to the IESG, so I assumed you wanted my opinion on this matter, so here it is. the notion that To: joe@koobera. math.uic.edu should be recognized as To: joe@koobera.math.uic.edu is pretty humorous. it sure violates "The Law of Least Amazement" in my book. but if that interpretation is somehow derivationally correct, which i find hard to believe based on experience, then the spec should be fixed. for what it's worth. glad to be of assistance in your deliberations. -mo