Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id QAA18883; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:08:24 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:07:34 -0500
Received:  
        by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id QAA18824; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:07:32 -0500
Received: from muenster.westfalen.de (muenster.westfalen.de [193.174.5.2]) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id QAA18811; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:07:25 -0500
Received: from khms.westfalen.de by muenster.westfalen.de
	via rsmtp with bsmtp
	id <m0vkcSF-000GxpC@muenster.westfalen.de>
	for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 22:01:03 +0100 (MET)
	(Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #1 built 1996-Nov-13)
Received: by khms.westfalen.de (CrossPoint v3.11 R/C435);
	  15 Jan 1997 21:41:19 +0100
Date: 15 Jan 1997 20:32:00 +0100
From: kai@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Message-ID: <6OwZajcEcsB@khms.westfalen.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970114181149.12054b-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com>
Subject: Re: From the chair: call for concensus
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.11 R/C435
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.

Chris.Newman@innosoft.com (Chris Newman)  wrote on 14.01.97 in <Pine.SOL.3.95.970114181149.12054b-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com>:

> This is a one week call for concensus on the following recently
> discussed issues.  If you object, please briefly summarize your technical
> reasons why.  As these topics have been well discussed, futher discussion
> is suspended for this week.

So far, it looks good to me.


MfG Kai