Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id UAA15719; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 20:41:52 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 20:41:50 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from CU.NIH.GOV by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id UAA15705; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 20:41:49 -0400
Message-Id: <199509150041.UAA15705@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU
From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
Date:     Thu, 14 Sep 1995  20:40:18 EDT
Subject:  Re:  summing up:  the meaning of the reply-to header

> 4. There is no concensus for the idea that lists should be prohibited
> from adding Reply-To.  Some would like to discourage this behavior;
> others don't think we can do anything about it.

And some think it's a reasonable thing to do in some circumstances.