Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA18395; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:17:57 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:17:56 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from mercury.Sun.COM by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA18387; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:17:53 -0400 Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM) id SAA09314; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 18:03:51 -0700 Received: from sage.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-5.3) id AA21144; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 18:03:47 -0700 Received: from sage (localhost) by sage.Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA20216; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 18:03:45 -0700 Message-Id: <9509150103.AA20216@sage.Eng.Sun.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.3 9/12/95 To: Mark Crispin Cc: Keith Moore , drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: summing up: the meaning of the reply-to header In-Reply-To: MRC's message of Thu, 14 Sep 1995 17:28:50 -0700. X-Url: http://www.smli.com/~bwelch/bwelch.html X-Face: "HxE|?EnC9fVMV8f70H83&{fgLE.|FZ^$>@Q(yb#N,Eh~N]e&]=>r5~UnRml1:4EglY{9B+ :'wJq$@c_C!l8@<$t,{YUr4K,QJGHSvS~U]H`<+L*x?eGzSk>XH\W:AK\j?@?c1o >>>Mark Crispin said: > I think that ReSent is too entrenched. I wonder, though, if it would be > possible to introduce a requirement that all ReSent-* headers be written in a > block starting with ReSent-Date, and that it is: > 1) mandatory that new ReSent headers be at the end of a header > 2) forbidden to relocate or reorder ReSent headers Point 2) is not enforceable, nor should it be. Many User Agents let users specify what headers they want to see. The others are scrolled off the top of the display, or eliminated entirely. Just because it is mandatory for RFC822 doesn't mean a user wants to see it. -- Brent Welch Sun Labs brent.welch@sun.com