Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id BAA05453; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 01:23:24 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 01:23:23 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from CU.NIH.GOV by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id BAA05446; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 01:23:22 -0400
Message-Id: <199509150523.BAA05446@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU
From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
Date:     Fri, 15 Sep 1995  01:22:17 EDT
Subject:  Re:  Another header-munging example

> Do people really think that Reply-to is so broken that it needs
> to be scrapped in favor of a new header?
>
> Keith

No, I don't.  And I thought your original summary was really
on the mark about what should be done about Reply-to.