Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA11585; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 09:06:20 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 09:06:18 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA11498; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 09:06:05 -0400 Message-Id: <199509151306.JAA11498@CS.UTK.EDU> Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by SEARN.SUNET.SE (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1815; Fri, 15 Sep 95 15:06:07 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin ERIC@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2b/1.8b) with RFC822 id 8303; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:06:07 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:05:03 +0200 From: Eric Thomas Subject: Re: Another header-munging example To: Keith Moore , Jacob Palme cc: ietf-drums In-Reply-To: Message of Fri, 15 Sep 1995 04:22:54 +0200 (MET DST) from Jacob Palme On Fri, 15 Sep 1995 04:22:54 +0200 (MET DST) Jacob Palme said: >Even trying to get an agreement for a narrower implementation of >"Reply-To" is "fixing mailing lists", so if fixing mailing lists is >outside our charter, we chould do nothing in this case, nor in the case >of "Resent-". I'd just like to point out that I don't know any mailing list software that generates "Resent-" tags. Eric