Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id OAA13489; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 14:18:28 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 14:18:27 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id OAA13479; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 14:18:24 -0400
Received: from localhost by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU
	(5.65+UW95.02/UW-NDC Revision: 2.27.MRC ) id AA05816; Fri, 15 Sep 95 11:10:06 -0700
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 11:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Sender: Mark Crispin <mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Subject: Re: Another header-munging example 
To: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>
Cc: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>, Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE>,
        ietf-drums <drums@CS.UTK.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199509151723.NAA23832@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
Message-Id: <MailManager.811188434.5710.mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

On Fri, 15 Sep 1995 13:23:02 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> I haven't yet seen anything even approaching concensus that we should
> deprecate Reply-To and replace it with new headers.

Note too that deprecating Reply-To and replacing it with new headers would
break IMAP4.

Does anyone really believe that it is possible to change something as
fundamental as Reply-To?  This would be the greatest change ever made to mail,
and is absolutely not part of the charter of this group.