Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA27162; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 10:52:44 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Sun, 20 Apr 1997 10:51:21 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA27069; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 10:51:18 -0400 Received: from edelweb.fr (edelweb.fr [193.51.12.16]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA27043; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 10:51:11 -0400 Received: from champagne.edelweb.fr (champagne.edelweb.fr [193.51.14.161]) by edelweb.fr with ESMTP id QAA26876; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:51:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from emeriau.gctech.edelweb.fr (emeriau.gctech.edelweb.fr [193.51.14.5]) by champagne.edelweb.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA20552; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:51:08 +0200 From: Peter Sylvester Received: (sylvest@localhost) by emeriau.gctech.edelweb.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA18760; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:51:08 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:51:08 +0200 Message-Id: <199704201451.QAA18760@emeriau.gctech.edelweb.fr> To: moore@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: How Reply SHOULD Work Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu Keith Moore writes: > 1. For a large class of messages -- those with a single From address, > no Reply-To field, and only one recipient -- everybody's notion of > "reply" does the Right Thing. If you have an X.400 gatewayed address with authorizing and orginator, you will end up with From: and Sender: and maybe the default to From: may NOT be the Right Thing. > > 2. For EVERY OTHER MESSAGE not in the above class, I want to > consciously choose the set of recipients of any reply that I send. 2. For EVERY MESSAGE, I want to consciously choose the set of recipients of any reply that I send.