Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA04997; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 21:01:07 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Thu, 24 Apr 1997 20:59:54 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA04752; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 20:59:51 -0400 Received: from moon.nbn.com (moon.nbn.com [199.4.65.1]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA04741; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 20:59:47 -0400 Received: from candle.brasslantern.com (schaefer@zagzig.zanshin.com [206.155.48.241]) by moon.nbn.com (8.8.2/8.8.2/MOON) with ESMTP id RAA12133 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 17:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA20703 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 17:59:27 -0700 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970424175927.ZM20702@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 17:59:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <19970424233954.3315.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> Comments: In reply to "D. J. Bernstein" "Re: From the Chair: How Reply SHOULD Work" (Apr 24, 11:39pm) References: <19970424233954.3315.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: From the Chair: How Reply SHOULD Work MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 24, 11:39pm, D. J. Bernstein wrote: } Subject: Re: From the Chair: How Reply SHOULD Work } } > At the very least, I'd want to say "UAs SHOULD offer reply functions } > other than simple reply", and describe some of those functions. } } This is an unsuitable area for standardization. [...] } } I would suggest simply describing the current situation I don't think such a description is appropriate, either. At most, a nonspecific reference to other documents might be included; I'd avoid time-relative phrases like "current research." -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern