Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA24042; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 18:55:35 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 18:55:34 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from CU.NIH.GOV by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id SAA24025; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 18:55:32 -0400
Message-Id: <199509182255.SAA24025@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU
From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
Date:     Mon, 18 Sep 1995  18:53:52 EDT
Subject:  Re:  Resent- facility

> So what is needed might be that when people give the "Reply all"
> command, the mail system should ask them "Are you replying to the
> included or the surrounding message?" How can that question be
> phrased so that people understand it?

That's not the right question.  I may want to respond to some or
all addresses from both.  If the UA gives me a list of addresses,
it could simply include both sets for me to select from.