Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id TAA27204; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:48:56 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:48:54 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from wilma.cs.utk.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id TAA27198; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:48:53 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>
Received:  by wilma.cs.utk.edu (cf v2.11c-UTK)
          id TAA05978; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:48:52 -0400
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:48:52 -0400
Message-Id: <199509182348.TAA05978@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: one use of Resent-*
Cc: moore@CS.UTK.EDU

okay, I'll follow my own recommendation and document one present-day
use of Resent-*

If you autoforward your mail on a VMS system running PMDF
(using "set forward ..." in VMS MAIL), PMDF appears to add
the following headers:

Resent-Date: (the date at which the mail was forwarded)
Resent-From: (the original from address...NOT that of the user
	      forwarding the mail)
Resent-To:   (the address to which the mail is being forwarded)
Resent-message-id: (a new message id for the forwarded message)


I'm not interested in whether this is right or wrong; only
in what the different UA and MTA behaviors are.

Keith