Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id FAA07746; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 05:11:02 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 05:11:00 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from domen.uninett.no by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id FAA07708; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 05:10:52 -0400
From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Message-Id: <199509190910.FAA07708@CS.UTK.EDU>
Received: from domen.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) 
          id <21239-0@domen.uninett.no>; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 11:10:44 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>
cc: ietf-drums <drums@CS.UTK.EDU>
Subject: Re: Call for documentation: theory and practice of Resent-*
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 1995 17:32:28 EDT." <199509182132.RAA05551@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 11:10:42 +0200
Sender: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

Keith,

a) I wasn't there. I'll keep my mouth shut.
   (but can't resist doubting the relevance of documenting disagreement)

b) in MH 6.8.3, the resent-* headers are attached by the "dist" command
   at the *end* of the header, in the sequence "Resent-To: Resent-Date:
   Resent-From:". The "reply" command ignores totally all Resent-* headers.

That's my data point, anyway....

                 Harald A