Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA11647; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 13:20:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Fri, 29 Aug 1997 13:20:47 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA11596; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 13:20:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM (THOR.INNOSOFT.COM [192.160.253.66]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id NAA11580; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 13:20:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from eleanor.innosoft.com ("port 42114"@ELEANOR.INNOSOFT.COM) by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.1-10 #8694) with SMTP id <01IN0BD1O5FY94E3P5@INNOSOFT.COM> for drums@cs.utk.edu; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 10:19:40 PDT Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 10:21:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Newman Subject: Re: New IETF draft on "Messages between Email and Netnews" In-reply-to: To: Paul Hoffman Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Originator-Info: login-id=chris; server=thor.innosoft.com On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Having said this, I would like to volunteer IMC to be the keeper of the > "DRUMS out-of-scope and rathole list", a revisable report that summarizes > the issues that have been brought up but deemed out of scope or too hard to > deal with. If there's much interest here, I'll start writing it and pass it > around before we instantiate it as an IMC Report. That sounds quite useful. - Chris