Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id UAA28792; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:52:38 -0400
X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:52:36 EDT
Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from munnari.oz.au by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id UAA28784; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:52:14 -0400
Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50)
	id AA27702; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:46:27 +1000 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU)
To: Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE>
Cc: drums@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments and Resent-* header fields 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Sep 1995 23:48:05 +0100."
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:45:43 +1000
Message-Id: <20414.811989943@munnari.OZ.AU>
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>

    Date:        Sun, 24 Sep 1995 23:48:05 +0100
    From:        Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE>

    I don't see any reason not to do the same with Resent-* fields,
    since our charter gives us this ability.

You're right, we could simply deprecate Resent-* - that is
an option.

I don't believe it is the best option, I don't believe that
doing that gains us anything (we can't actually prohibit the
things, that wouldn't work) - on the other hand, leaving them
in provides a useful service, even if not everyone can use it.
We just need to clarify the use a little.

kre