Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA29109; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:56:07 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:56:06 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA29100; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:56:02 -0400 Message-Id: <199509250056.UAA29100@CS.UTK.EDU> Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by SEARN.SUNET.SE (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9594; Mon, 25 Sep 95 01:56:06 +0100 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin ERIC@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2b/1.8b) with RFC822 id 6914; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 01:56:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 01:52:43 +0100 From: Eric Thomas Subject: Re: Comments and Resent-* header fields To: Robert Elz cc: drums@CS.UTK.EDU In-Reply-To: Message of Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:45:43 +1000 from Robert Elz On Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:45:43 +1000 Robert Elz said: >We just need to clarify the use a little. And we're back to square one. You can't "clarify" that, say, mail servers must ignore Resent-* fields when major mail servers have been doing the exact opposite for 9 years and there is no alternative solution available *today*. Eric