Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA01739; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 21:39:39 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 21:39:38 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from munnari.oz.au by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id VAA01716; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 21:38:47 -0400 Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50) id AA00544; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 11:37:41 +1000 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU) To: Eric Thomas Cc: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: Comments and Resent-* header fields In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Sep 1995 01:52:43 +0100." Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 11:37:06 +1000 Message-Id: <20425.811993026@munnari.OZ.AU> From: Robert Elz Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 01:52:43 +0100 From: Eric Thomas You can't "clarify" that, say, mail servers must ignore Resent-* fields when major mail servers have been doing the exact opposite for 9 years and there is no alternative solution available *today*. Of course we can, if that is the desire. Like any standard it will take time to be sensibly adopted (like your US butter example), but having a standard that says the right things allows the world to move towards the desired end (users can point out to the mail server owner that it is violating the standard, they can point it out to its author, perhaps the server will be fixed, perhaps it will be replaced, perhaps in the long run the standard will be ignored). kre