Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA16110; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 17:46:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Tue, 23 Sep 1997 17:46:00 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA16068; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 17:45:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frobozz.qualcomm.com (frobozz.qualcomm.com [129.46.174.26]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA16035; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 17:45:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [129.46.136.131] (randy-mac.qualcomm.com [129.46.136.131]) by frobozz.qualcomm.com (8.8.5/1.4/8.7.2/1.13) with ESMTP id OAA15911; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 14:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <01bcc85b$15fb4860$abe8379d@cassatt.cassatt.dns.microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Eudora Pro for Macintosh Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 14:29:49 -0700 To: "Jeff Stephenson" From: Randall Gellens Subject: Re: TURN and disconnected SMTP with dynamic IP addresses Cc: , At 12:58 PM -0700 9/23/97, Jeff Stephenson wrote: >_Is_ SASL in last call? I've seen that assertion several times, but I don't >recall ever getting mail to that effect and don't see any on the SASL >archive site. The IETF Web site lists it as under AD review. Anyone know >what's going on? I saw the Last Call announcement on the IETF Announce list, and the announcement for version -12 of the SASl draft said it reflected comments received during Last Call. -- Randall Gellens || Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; randy@qualcomm.com || I speak for myself alone -- This will be a memorable month -- no matter how hard you try to forget it.