Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id OAA18796; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 14:00:37 -0400
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id OAA18766; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 14:00:23 -0400
Message-Id: <199510031800.OAA18766@CS.UTK.EDU>
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by SEARN.SUNET.SE (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 0280; Tue, 03 Oct 95 19:00:12 +0100
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin ERIC@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2b/1.8b) with RFC822 id 0508; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 18:38:47 +0100
Date:        Tue, 3 Oct 1995 18:36:50 +0100
From: Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE>
Subject:     Re: Comments and Resent-* header fields
To: hta@dale.uninett.no, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
cc: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>, drums@CS.UTK.EDU
In-Reply-To: Message of Mon, 02 Oct 1995 21:17:24 +0100 from hta@dale.uninett.no

If a message has both Resent- and non-resent fields, LISTSERV uses the
Resent- fields and ignore the original ones. RiceMail does pretty much
the same, and so does most VMS-based software (before deciding what to
put in the relevant VMSmail fields). I never read mail on unix, so I'm
not really familiar with unix mail programs.

  Eric