Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id WAA18461; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 22:00:09 -0400
Received: from wilma.cs.utk.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id WAA18453; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 22:00:07 -0400
Received: from LOCALHOST by wilma.cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.11c-UTK)
          id WAA26620; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 22:00:05 -0400
Message-Id: <199510040200.WAA26620@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
cc: drums@CS.UTK.EDU, moore@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments and Resent-* header fields 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 1995 21:33:27 EDT."
             <199510040135.VAA17031@CS.UTK.EDU> 
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 1995 21:59:59 -0400
Sender: moore@CS.UTK.EDU

> Probably the more interesting behavior is that for messages to a
> moderated list.  When a message to a moderated list arrives, LISTSERV
> sends it to one of the moderators.  That moderator may edit the
> message, if desired, and forward it back to the list with a Resent-From
> containing the moderator's address.  The message will be distributed to
> the list with the original From field intact, so that replies go to the
> original sender, rather than the moderator.

This particular use seems consistent with the use of Resent-* to
denote "manual" operations rather than automatic ones.

Keith