Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA29523; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 20:34:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Thu, 23 Oct 1997 20:32:51 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA29433; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 20:32:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.com (h-205-217-237-46.netscape.com [205.217.237.46]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA29422; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 20:32:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dredd.mcom.com (dredd.mcom.com [205.217.237.54]) by netscape.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA04804 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 17:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gimp ([205.217.227.11]) by dredd.mcom.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with SMTP id AAA26666 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 17:31:58 -0700 Sender: jwz@netscape.com (Jamie Zawinski) Message-ID: <344FEC19.7E01E3BE@netscape.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 17:30:17 -0700 From: Jamie Zawinski Organization: Netscape Communications Corporation, Mozilla Division X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.02 (X11; U; IRIX 6.2 IP22) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: reply-to munging by lists is not just about eliminating duplicates References: <199710232228.SAA13804@spot.cs.utk.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Keith Moore wrote: > > > What mailers do not allow reply authors to edit the recipient list? > > None of the ones that I currently use. But a number of my friends are > stuck using MUAs that either don't allow this at all, or make it > fairly difficult. and later: > > It turns out that they weren't concerned about eliminiating > duplicates. They wanted reply-to munging because their MUAs don't > have "reply all", or they don't know how to use it. Which is it? "Didn't have it", or "they didn't read the manual"? Please, name names! What software? You keep not answering this question. I believe you that such software exists. I would very much like to know what that software is. And who makes it. And who has the huge misfortune of being forced to use it. And why. And what portion of the global user base might be suffering this same misfortune. Is this a secret for some reason? I have never, ever, in ten years, encountered such software. Perhaps I lead a sheltered life. Enlighten me! -- Jamie Zawinski http://people.netscape.com/jwz/ about:jwz