Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA23554; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 14:16:10 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 4 Oct 1995 14:16:05 -0400 Received: from daisy.ee.und.ac.za by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA23492; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 14:15:37 -0400 Received: by daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Smail3.1.28.1 #31) id m0t0YLb-0007VQC; Wed, 4 Oct 95 20:15 GMT+0200 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 20:15:13 +0200 (GMT+0200) From: Alan Barrett X-Sender: barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: support for Postmaster address In-Reply-To: <199509220740.DAA17233@wilma.cs.utk.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sorry, I am a week or two behind in drums mail. > But it's not clear in the world of MX records whether the > Postmaster address must be supported for every domain name > that can possibly receive mail, or for every parent domain > of a domain that can possibly receive mail. I once understood the line from RFC822 that says "Postmaster@domain" is required to be valid as a requirement that *every domain* had to have a postmaster, even if it did not otherwise have any email addresses, and I went to some trouble to make postmaster@za work, but I have since seen the error of my ways. > I'm tempted to suggest that the Postmaster address must be > supported for > > + any domain that appears on the right-hand side of an @ in a > sender address (either header or envelope), or Yes. > + any domain which is listed as a mail exchanger for some other > domain, or > + any domain which appears in a Received header. As others have said, there are cases where that's not easy to support. --apb (Alan Barrett)