Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA20446; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:29:56 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:29:25 -0400 Received: from CU.NIH.GOV by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA20377; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:29:19 -0400 Message-Id: <199510042129.RAA20377@CS.UTK.EDU> To: drums@cs.utk.edu From: "Roger Fajman" Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 17:26:51 EDT Subject: Re: What's the sender header for? > The difference between To and CC may not be preciesly defined, > but they're not precisely defined for paper mail either, and > they're still useful. A somewhat precise answer as to when > to use To and when to use CC might be found in a "style" or > "etiquette" or "protocol" guide for human communications, but > exactly what To and CC mean are probably context-dependent. I agree that To and CC and not precisely defined. In my own mind, the difference does not relate to who should see replies. I am often interested in replies to messages that I am CCed on. To me the difference is more in who is expected to act upon the message. People in the To field are expected to act, while people in the CC field are just being informed.