Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id MAA11282; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 12:53:04 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Thu, 5 Oct 1995 12:52:40 -0400 Received: from rome.software.com by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id MAA11245; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 12:52:37 -0400 Received: from rome.software.com ([198.17.234.100]) by rome.software.com (post.office MTA v1.9.1 ID# 0-10001) with ESMTP id AAA3819; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 09:39:29 -0700 X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94 To: Robert Elz cc: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: support for Postmaster address Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 05 Oct 1995 09:39:27 -0700 From: michael.derrico@software.com (Michael D'Errico) Message-ID: <19951005163928.AAA3819@rome.software.com> > - Any FQDN that is listed in a Received header SHOULD have a postmaster > > I can tolerate that. I would limit this to the "by domain" part of the Received header. The "from domain" part often identifies a user's computer that doesn't run an SMTP server. Mike