Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA07102; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:22:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.7); Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:20:00 -0500
Received:  
        by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA06907; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:19:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (koobera.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.247]) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA06890; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:19:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 14352 invoked by uid 666); 12 Dec 1997 17:20:31 -0000
Date: 12 Dec 1997 17:20:31 -0000
Message-ID: <19971212172031.14351.qmail@cr.yp.to>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: New solution to the Reply-To issue

> Solution: Keep "Reply-To". Add both "Mail-Followup-To" and "Reply-To-
> Meaning", but do not include "Reply-All" in the value set for "Reply-To-
> Meaning".

Why is this better than Mail-Followup-To/Mail-Reply-To?

---Dan
Put an end to fake mailing list subscriptions. http://pobox.com/~djb/ezmlm.html