Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id LAA15744; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 11:41:15 -0500 Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.3); Thu, 30 Nov 1995 11:38:35 -0500 Received: from ester.dsv.su.se by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id LAA15232; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 11:38:32 -0500 Received: (from jpalme@localhost) by ester.dsv.su.se (8.7.1/8.7.1) id RAA14297; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 17:38:27 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 17:38:27 +0100 (MET) From: Jacob Palme To: ietf-drums cc: Web4Groups User Requirements Mailing List , mailnews-l@segate.sunet.se Subject: On the use of 8-bit transfer Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Is it correct that ietf-drums will recommend people to avoid using 8-bit MIME unless they know that all the recipients and intervening mailers can handle 8-bit MIME? What about 8-bit in Usenet News? Is it permitted? It seems to happen very often. If 8-bit is customary in Usenet News, but should be avoided in e-mail, then this means that if the same message is sent to both news and e-mail, or forwarded between these two environments, then the message may have to be translated from 8-bit to 7-bit format (using Quoted-Printable or Base64) or the reverse in gateways between news and e-mail. Is this correct? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jacob Palme (Stockholm University and KTH) for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme