Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980319205513.0092f510@pop.dial.pipex.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 11:33:58 +0000
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ACM.ORG>
Subject: Re: A different approach to the Reply-To problem
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>,
        DRUMS WG <drums@cs.utk.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 13:02 19/03/98 -0600, Pete Resnick wrote:
>On 3/19/98 at 1:44 AM -0600, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>
>>The word "automated" seems wrong to me, as I think autoresponders when
>>I see the word "automated".
>
>I wanted to avoid the issue of whether or not people can send a message any
>darn place they want to. I want to say that these instructions are for
>programs that create lists of recipients for replies, much like section
>4.4.4 of RFC 822. If you can come up with a different way of saying this,
>I'd be glad to include it.

I don't have the original text to hand, but would "UA-generated address"
fit the bill?  (Would that be UAtomated ?-)

GK.
---

------------
Graham Klyne