Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA08596; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:15:44 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:15:43 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id UAA08577; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:15:37 -0400 Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50); id AA07748 Thu, 1 Jun 1995 10:12:03 +1000 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU) To: Eric Thomas Cc: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: getting started In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Jun 1995 01:23:55 +0200." Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 10:10:42 +1000 Message-Id: <1041.801965442@munnari.OZ.AU> From: Robert Elz Date: Thu, 1 Jun 1995 01:23:55 +0200 From: Eric Thomas Since noone can mandate that "if you don't do X you can't gate to the Internet", This is way off topic of this list (and has been for ages), but one last message. This is true - but perhaps the list owners of the internet could agree to simply delete anyone whose mailer or mail gateway does any of these absurd things, perhaps even testing when a potentially dubious address is to be added, and refuse requests from recipients whose mailers misbehave. (Just send a carefully constructed message to a bogus address, and see where the bounce comes, if it returns to the correct place, add the user, if not, refuse them - this would even be easy to automate). The inability to subscribe to any internet lists (and no-one can mandate that any particular user must be allowed on any particular list) might just get some of those users so angry that they insist on mailers, or mail gateways, that operate rationally. kre ps: I have run at least average sited mailing lists, and have seen none of the problem you describe, though that may be because the kinds of people likely to be on the type of list I'd run are probably unlikely to be using MS mail (or similar).