Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id XAA21822; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 23:09:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.9); Wed, 25 Mar 1998 23:08:45 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id XAA21779; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 23:08:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (koobera.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.247]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id XAA21767; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 23:08:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 4068 invoked by uid 666); 26 Mar 1998 04:11:17 -0000 Date: 26 Mar 1998 04:11:16 -0000 Message-ID: <19980326041116.4062.qmail@cr.yp.to> From: "D. J. Bernstein" To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: why public-reply-to is inferior Mail-Followup-To: drums@cs.utk.edu References: Uzi Paz writes: > * "Public-Reply-To:" to be set by MLMs. I send a message to drums@cs.utk.edu and nonsubscriber@netcom.com. The drums MLM figures out, correctly, that followups should go to drums@cs.utk.edu and nonsubscriber@netcom.com, not to me. But nonsubscriber@netcom.com never receives this information. He sends an extra copy to me. How do I solve this? Answer: Mail-Followup-To. The MUA, not the MLM, sets the information, so it's in _every_ copy of the message. See? ---Dan Smaller, faster, safer than inetd+tcpd. http://pobox.com/~djb/ucspi-tcp.html