Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA18554; Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:27:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.9); Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:27:45 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA18509; Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (koobera.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.247]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA18493; Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 7119 invoked by uid 666); 30 Mar 1998 03:44:41 -0000 Date: 30 Mar 1998 03:44:41 -0000 Message-ID: <19980330034441.7117.qmail@cr.yp.to> From: "D. J. Bernstein" To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Syntax issues in draft-ietf-drums-msg-fmt-04.txt Mail-Followup-To: drums@cs.utk.edu References: <19980330014625.6298.qmail@cr.yp.to> <3891.891223797@aussie.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Robert Elz writes: > That is, I personally can't see > how having the time in a Received header in UTC is in slightest bit more > useful than having it in the local zone. It's much easier to see time differences that way. I don't care what time zones the relays happen to be in. > single token (atom in your words, though clearly not an 822 "atom") It's an atom. Why are you having so much trouble with this? > then it would be possible to argue that 1*word (ie: phrase) > should also be a single token, Nope. 1*word means ``one or more tokens, each token being a word.'' ---Dan Smaller, faster, safer than inetd+tcpd. http://pobox.com/~djb/ucspi-tcp.html