Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id XAA18134; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:39:09 -0500
Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.3); Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:38:29 -0500
Received: from jekyll.piermont.com by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id XAA18108; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:38:28 -0500
Received: (from perry@localhost) by jekyll.piermont.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA15790; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:38:10 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:38:10 -0500
Message-Id: <199512080438.XAA15790@jekyll.piermont.com>
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: IPv6 address representation
Reply-to: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission


Just checking, but is there any agreement on how IPv6 address literals
are to be represented in email addresses?

.pm