Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id RAA21281; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 17:32:39 -0500
Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.3); Sun, 10 Dec 1995 17:30:30 -0500
Received: from jekyll.piermont.com by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id RAA21172; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 17:30:28 -0500
Received: from localhost (perry@localhost) by jekyll.piermont.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA22565; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 17:30:12 -0500
Message-Id: <199512102230.RAA22565@jekyll.piermont.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: jekyll.piermont.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Olle Jarnefors <ojarnef@admin.kth.se>
cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: IPv6 address representation 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Dec 1995 22:35:48 +0100."
             <9512092135.AA15824@mercutio.admin.kth.se> 
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 17:30:11 -0500
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>


Olle Jarnefors writes:
> information" can't be met. It will be necessary, I suppose, to
> invent a toplevel pseudo-domain .ipv6:

Why, when we already have ip6.int?

Perry