Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id DAA12890; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 03:50:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.9); Sun, 12 Apr 1998 03:50:10 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id DAA12836; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 03:50:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from munnari.OZ.AU (munnari.OZ.AU [128.250.1.21]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id DAA12824; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 03:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id HA24662; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:49:44 +1000 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU) To: "D. J. Bernstein" Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Bare CRs and LFs In-Reply-To: "D. J. Bernstein"'s message of "12 Apr 1998 07:25:12 +0000." References: <19980409211003.988.qmail@cr.yp.to> <7967.892360385@munnari.OZ.AU> <19980412072512.15199.qmail@cr.yp.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:49:43 +1000 Message-Id: <8334.892367383@munnari.OZ.AU> From: Robert Elz Date: 12 Apr 1998 07:25:12 -0000 From: "D. J. Bernstein" Message-ID: <19980412072512.15199.qmail@cr.yp.to> | But RFC 1958 also recommends that new protocols use case-independent | names for ``protocol elements that are transmitted in text format.'' That I will admit was one or the more controversial phrases in 1958. Some people feel strongly one way, and others the other. Debating it again here in drums would hardly be productive. kre