To: "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@Glue.umd.edu>
Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Where do the revised RFC1123 SMTP limits go? 
In-Reply-To: "Randall S. Winchester"'s message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 00:03:27 -0400."
References: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980512235632.11657C-100000@atlantis.csc.umd.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 15:25:30 +1000
Message-Id: <1162.895037130@munnari.OZ.AU>
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>

    Date:        Wed, 13 May 1998 00:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
    From:        "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@Glue.umd.edu>
    Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980512235632.11657C-100000@atlantis.csc.umd.edu>

  | ------> draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd-10.txt.Z <------
  | Does DRUMS intend to revisit this, or are the SMTP limits being added to
  | some other draft?

We're just all waiting (exceedingly patiently...) for a new version of the
draft.  The old one (-06 - no idea what happened to the 07 08 and 09 versions)
simply expired through not having been updated for too long.

This is the correct forum to discuss it - and if you want/need a copy of
the -06 version of the draft, you can get it from
	ftp://munnari.oz.au/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-drums-smtpupd-06.txt.Z

Do be aware that it is quite ancient now (which is why it expired), and
there have been quite a few agreed updates which are yet to see the I-D
directories, so commenting on -06 might be wasting your time.

Perhaps John could give us some kind of hint when a -11 might appear ??

kre