Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA00390; Wed, 13 May 1998 09:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.10); Wed, 13 May 1998 09:32:59 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA00342; Wed, 13 May 1998 09:32:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from att.com (cagw1.att.com [192.128.52.89]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA00328; Wed, 13 May 1998 09:32:52 -0400 (EDT) From: To: drums@cs.utk.edu Received: by cagw1.att.com; Wed May 13 09:25 EDT 1998 Received: (from nuucp@localhost) by caig1.att.att.com (AT&T/GW-1.0) id JAA28661 for cs.utk.edu!drums; Wed, 13 May 1998 09:32:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199805131332.JAA28661@caig1.att.att.com> Original-To: attmail!internet!Glue.umd.edu!rsw (Randall S. Winchester) Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 09:25 EDT Subject: Re: subversion of WGs by document editors Organization: AT&T Laboratories Content-Type: text Randall Winchester writes: < If "cc" is allowed without "to" then you could state something like; < < Both the "To:" field and the "Bcc:" field MAY occur alone. The "Cc:" field < SHOULD normally only be present if the "To:" field is also present. < However, If there are no "primary recipients", then just "courtesy copies" < MAY be sent. I'd like to add the following: However, If there are no "primary recipients", >>> or if the primary recipients have been specified by other means outside of the scope of this draft, <<< then just "courtesy copies" MAY be sent. Tony Hansen tony@att.com, tony@attmail.com http://home.att.net/~Tony-Hansen