Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id HAA15143; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 07:57:04 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Fri, 29 Dec 1995 07:56:52 -0500 Received: from munnari.oz.au by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id HAA15123; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 07:56:44 -0500 Received: by munnari.oz.au (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55) id MA02852; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 23:56:40 +1100 (from kre) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 23:56:40 +1100 From: Robert Elz Message-Id: <9512291256.2852@munnari.oz.au> To: drums@cs.utk.edu, jpalme@dsv.su.se Subject: Header to label lists (was untitled) Of Mailing-List Group and Mail-Group I much prefer the first. However much they are currently mangled together, newsgroups and mailing lists are not the same thing, and anything that tends to even subliminally suggest they are should be avoided. I am not sure we should be even considering defining new headers here however, especially not for a new purpose like this, a WG to consider mailing list issues would be a better forum. But while on the topic of headers, is there anything we can do to try to stamp out the practice of mailers advertising themselves in X-* headers. I rather doubt it, and I expect there are probably people who believe this somehow helps them debug problems (oh, that was sent from the dead-fish mailer, that always mangles the foobar header, so ignore that value...) - but it would be nice to make the practice stop. kre